Current:Home > ScamsAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -Prosper Capital Insights
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-27 12:53:06
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (2)
Related
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- Allen Weisselberg sentenced to 5 months for his role in Trump Organization tax fraud
- Sony says its PlayStation 5 shortage is finally over, but it's still hard to buy
- Warming Trends: Chief Heat Officers, Disappearing Cave Art and a Game of Climate Survival
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- Kate Hudson Bonds With Ex Matt Bellamy’s Wife Elle Evans During London Night Out
- Video game testers approve the first union at Microsoft
- People in Tokyo wait in line 3 hours for a taste of these Japanese rice balls
- Who's hosting 'Saturday Night Live' tonight? Musical guest, how to watch Dec. 14 episode
- Young Voters, Motivated by Climate Change and Environmental Justice, Helped Propel Biden’s Campaign
Ranking
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- Video: As Covid-19 Hinders City Efforts to Protect Residents From the Heat, Community Groups Step In
- Buying an electric car? You can get a $7,500 tax credit, but it won't be easy
- Paying for Extreme Weather: Wildfire, Hurricanes, Floods and Droughts Quadrupled in Cost Since 1980
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- Video game testers approve the first union at Microsoft
- The economics lessons in kids' books
- Utilities Have Big Plans to Cut Emissions, But They’re Struggling to Shed Fossil Fuels
Recommendation
The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
Covid Killed New York’s Coastal Resilience Bill. People of Color Could Bear Much of the Cost
See Al Pacino, 83, and Girlfriend Noor Alfallah on Date Night After Welcoming Baby Boy
Paying for Extreme Weather: Wildfire, Hurricanes, Floods and Droughts Quadrupled in Cost Since 1980
Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Part Ways With Spotify
Rebel Wilson Shares Glimpse Into Motherhood With “Most Adorable” Daughter Royce
Vacation rental market shift leaves owners in nerve-wracking situation as popular areas remain unbooked