Current:Home > StocksMontana banned TikTok. Whatever comes next could affect the app's fate in the U.S. -Prosper Capital Insights
Montana banned TikTok. Whatever comes next could affect the app's fate in the U.S.
View
Date:2025-04-15 02:58:35
Montana has become the first state to ban TikTok, setting up a possible legal battle that could affect the fate of the popular social media app in the U.S.
The ban, slated to take effect on Jan. 1, is considered the most drastic measure any state has taken against TikTok. Many cybersecurity experts have questioned whether Montana can effectively implement something so new and complex.
Gov. Greg Gianforte signed the bill, Senate Bill 419 on Wednesday, saying it is intended to safeguard the data of Montana residents from the Chinese government, echoing theoretical fears that officials in the White House have with the hit video app.
TikTok is owned by Beijing-based tech giant ByteDance. For years, national security experts in Washington have been wary about the app's growing popularity in the U.S., citing intelligence laws in China that provide the government unfettered access to company records. Yet there is no public evidence that Chinese officials have ever sought TikTok user data.
How will the ban work?
Under the Montana law, tech companies, not everyday users of TikTok, could be penalized. For instance, Apple and Google, which operate app stores on phones and devices, could be subjected to fines up to $10,000 a day for letting people download TikTok.
Representatives from Apple and Google have not commented on the law, but cybersecurity experts say there are a few ways the companies could comply.
Apple and Google could block TikTok from all accounts that have billing addresses in Montana, said Roger Entner, a telecoms analyst at Recon Analytics.
Entner said the companies could also prevent all IP addresses located within Montana's borders from being able to download TikTok from app stores.
"If they can prevent you in China from accessing Google, that's the same thing," Entner said. "So of course Apple and Google can prevent Montana residents from accessing TikTok."
That said, there would be loopholes, like using a virtual private network, or VPN, a service that can be used to sidestep internet restrictions, Entner said.
"The ban gets tricky. If you're near a state border, and your phone pings a cell phone tower inside of Montana, it might look like you're in Montana when you're not," he said. "The ban could hit many people who shouldn't be affected."
TikTok expected to launch a legal fight
TikTok is expected to fight the law in court.
Groups including the ACLU support it challenging the law, which they cast as a violation of the First Amendment.
"The government cannot impose a total ban on a communications platform like TikTok unless it is necessary to prevent extremely serious, immediate harm to national security," the ACLU said in a statement. "But there's no public evidence of harm that would meet the high bar set by the U.S. and Montana Constitutions, and a total ban would not be the only option for addressing such harm if it did exist."
Legal experts say that, while the First Amendment does protect free expression on TikTok, the government can restrict speech if there there is a risk to national security, such as if online speech is providing support to terrorists. Far less certain is whether the perceived danger TikTok poses to national security would override the free speech protections.
Digital rights groups, including the Electronic Frontier Foundation, do not see TikTok as a national security risk and are sounding the alarm about the Montana law.
"This unconstitutional ban undermines the free speech and association of Montana TikTok users and intrudes on TikTok's interest in disseminating its users' videos," the organization said in a statement. "It is a blatant violation of the First Amendment, whether it's done by Congress or Montana. This ban won't protect Montana residents' private data. Companies will continue to harvest and monetize personal info and make it widely available to purchasers, thieves, and foreign actors."
Last December, Gianforte banned TikTok on state government electronic devices.
On Wednesday, he added that the ban would expand to include "all social media applications that collect and provide users' personal information or data to a foreign adversary, or a person or entity located within a country designated as a foreign adversary," including the popular messaging app, WeChat, which is owned by China-based Tencent.
Montana's legal fight with TikTok could influence White House decision
President Biden signed legislation banning the app from government devices last December, and has been considering an all-out ban if TikTok's parent company ByteDance, cannot find an American buyer.
TikTok, for its part, has invested $1.5 billion into a data security plan known as "Project Texas," that the company says will cordon off all of Americans' data from China.
But the Biden administration has not been satisfied with the proposal, since it falls short of ByteDance selling off TikTok to an American tech company, or a group of investors outside of China.
Negotiations over the future of TikTok have reached a standstill in the White House, even as China hawks close to Biden continue to push for an outright national ban of TikTok.
Now, the first legal test of such a ban will likely pit Montana state officials against TikTok, the outcome of which could inform the next steps the White House takes.
veryGood! (99)
Related
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- Grizzly bears coming back to Washington state as some decry return of 'apex predator'
- NFL power rankings: Which teams are up, down after 2024 draft?
- Why Jason Priestley Left Hollywood for a Life in Nashville
- Sam Taylor
- Füllkrug fires Dortmund to 1-0 win over Mbappé's PSG in Champions League semifinal first leg
- Cher opens up to Jennifer Hudson about her hesitance to date Elvis Presley: 'I was nervous'
- Earthquakes measuring over 3.0 rattles Dallas-Fort Worth area Wednesday afternoon
- Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
- Nick Viall and Natalie Joy Cancel Honeymoon After “Nightmare” Turn of Events
Ranking
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Walnuts sold in at least 19 states linked to E. coli outbreak in California, Washington: See map
- Buy 1 Kylie Cosmetics Lip Kit and Get 1 Free, Shop New Coach Discounts Every Hour & 92 More Daily Deals
- United Methodists overwhelmingly vote to repeal longstanding ban on LGBTQ clergy
- Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
- Melissa McCarthy reacts to Barbra Streisand's awkward Ozempic comment: 'I win the day'
- 5th victim’s body recovered from Baltimore Key Bridge collapse, 1 still missing
- A new Statehouse and related projects will cost about $400 million
Recommendation
Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
A fiery crash involving tanker carrying gas closes I-95 in Connecticut in both directions
A retired teacher saw inspiration in Columbia’s protests. Eric Adams called her an outside agitator
Critics question if longtime Democratic congressman from Georgia is too old for reelection
SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
A new Statehouse and related projects will cost about $400 million
Ex-Nickelodeon producer Schneider sues ‘Quiet on Set’ makers for defamation, sex abuse implications
Senators want limits on the government’s use of facial recognition technology for airport screening